Marine Conservation Agreements
A Practitioner's Toolkit
www.mcatoolkit.org

Myth 14: Marine Conservation Agreements depend on tourism revenues to meet their financial needs.

Fact 14: Tourism revenues are one potential source of financing for Marine Conservation Agreements, but most existing projects depend on other sources of funding.

Marine Conservation Agreement (MCA) projects can meet their up front and long-term financial needs through many sources, only one of which is tourism. It is true that one of the most visible, long-standing MCA projects (the Chumbe Island Coral Park) and an up and coming MCA project (the Misool Ecoresort) rely primarily on tourism revenues to meet their management costs. MCA projects like these, however, are not the norm because so few projects present the necessary elements for successful ecotourism operations. The majority of known MCA Field Projects receive financing from public and private grants, private donations, commercial interests and payments from industry to meet regulatory requirements (i.e., wetland mitigation). Additional information can be found in Funding.

 

Return to Top

 

Overview
Basics
Myths
Definitions
Field Guide
Phase 1: Feasibility Analysis
Phase 2: Engagement
Phase 3: Agreement Design
Phase 4: Implementation
Field Projects
Ecuador
Fiji
Indonesia 1
Indonesia 2
Kiribati
Mexico
Mozambique
Tanzania
United Kingdom
US: California 1
US: California 2
US: California 3
US: Connecticut
US: Massachusetts
US: New York
US: Rhode Island
US: Texas
US: Virginia
US: Washington 1
US: Washington 2
Country and State Analyses
Belize
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Indonesia
Kenya
Madagascar
Mexico
Mozambique
Peru
Philippines
Seychelles
South Africa
Spain
Tanzania
United States
Western Indian Ocean
Other Countries
Resources
Contacts
Funding
Publications and Presentations
Sample Documents
Meetings — MCAs
Meetings — Submerged Lands
U.S. State Maps

Site Map

Translate This Page

Marine Conservation Agreements     Copyright © 2007-2011 The Nature Conservancy