Marine Conservation Agreements
A Practitioner's Toolkit
www.mcatoolkit.org

3.3 Compliance

  1. Phase 3: Agreement Design Checklist
  2. 3.1 Conservation commitments are established
  3. 3.2 Recipient benefits are determined
  4. 3.3 Compliance mechanisms are developed
  5. 3.4 Sanctions are agreed upon
  6. 3.5 Regulatory permits issued or applied for
  7. 3.6 Final actions are completed

The success of a Marine Conservation Agreement (MCA) hinges on a credible monitoring framework to verify compliance with the conservation commitments and justify sanctions in the event of non-compliance. Items to monitor include:

  • Compliance with conservation commitments (e.g., no dredging or dynamiting, no hunting or fishing, no illegal mining, as well as performance with respect to conservation actions such as patrolling and boundary maintenance)
  • Effectiveness/equity of benefits management (e.g., proportion of resource users receiving benefits, accountability for funds used)
  • Awareness, understanding, and satisfaction related to the MCA

Compliance monitoring should be further developed in sub-steps 4.4 Science and 4.5 Enforcement.

Compliance Reporting

Compliance reporting is the mechanism by which infractions to the terms and conditions of the MCAs will be identified, recorded, reported, discussed and agreed upon by the lead conservation organization, right-holders and other direct stakeholders. For example, patrolling is one possible compliance reporting mechanism for MCA infractions, which may proceed in a simplified scenario as:

  • Identification: Community MPA guards observe local community members collecting shellfish within no-take zone
  • Recording: MPA guards record observations in daily patrol logs
  • Reporting: MPA guards submit logs to MPA Manager
  • Discussion: MPA Manager discusses infraction with community leaders and the identified local community members to determine sanctions
  • Disposition: Sanction is imposed as per the terms of the MCA and as agreed upon

The primary compliance reporting mechanisms must be articulated within the MCA.

Next Sub-step

After developing effective compliance mechanisms, sanctions for non-compliance must be agreed upon.

Proceed to 3.4 Sanctions

Return to Top

 

Overview
Basics
Myths
Definitions
Field Guide
Phase 1: Feasibility Analysis
Phase 2: Engagement
Phase 3: Agreement Design
Phase 4: Implementation
Field Projects
Chile
Ecuador
Fiji
Indonesia 1
Indonesia 2
Kiribati
Mexico
Philippines
Tanzania
United Kingdom
US: California 1
US: California 2
US: California 3
US: Connecticut
US: Massachusetts
US: New York
US: Rhode Island
US: Texas
US: Virginia
US: Washington 1
US: Washington 2
Country Analyses
Belize
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Indonesia
Mexico
Peru
Spain
United States
Other Countries
U.S. State Analyses
Alabama
Alaska
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Mississippi
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Texas
Virginia
Washington
Other States
U.S. State Maps
Alabama
Alaska
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Mississippi
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Texas
Virginia
Washington
Resources
Contacts
Funding
Publications and Presentations
Related Tools
Sample Documents
Meetings Archive

Site Map

Marine Conservation Agreements     Copyright © 2007-2010 The Nature Conservancy